###ECEN4013 ###http://ecen4013.okstate.edu ###http://ecen4013.okstate.edu ###Please provide thoughtful written comments about each of your team members so they can learn how you viewed their contributions to the team. After all evaluations are submitted they will be able to read these comments but not tell who they came from. You and they can use this feedback to improve your future performance on engineering teams.

If you have a distinctive writing style we recommend you use one of the widely available text translators listed below.
The Dialectizer - convert to a humorous dialect
BabelFish - convert from English to another language and back (http://babelfish.altavista.com/)

###Enter a comment at least 50 words long for your teammate here. Do not copy and paste the same comment for all team members. ###1 ###Here you may enter comments that will be visible by the professor but not by other students. There is no way for the professor to associate the comments you make here with your name. ###50 ###0 ###Welcome to the Peer Evaluation system. Please verify that the names listed below are the names of your teammates. If anything is incorrect please contact your professor or TA before proceeding. ###1 ###1 ###Hours Worked ###Did this person always seem to be working in the lab? Did you always seen them when you came in? ###Taking on Tasks ###How willing was this person to take on extra work? Did your team always turn to them when something needed to get done? ###Helping Others ###Was he or she the fall-back person? Did they always seem to help others when needed? Did they help other people on the team complete their projects? ###Attention to Detail ###How much attention to detail did this person exhibit? Did they need to do every job perfectly? ###Completing Tasks ###How good was this person at getting their tasks done. Did they always finish what they started? ###Quality Work ###Was the work this person did right? Did their tasks work and get done right the first time? ###Please rate each of your team members on how much they contributed to your team. This rating should be based on all the work done as a team, both in and out of class. You may use non-integer values (i.e. 3.5).

Your scores should have an average in the range of 3.0. Ratings of 1 and 5 should be reserved for very special cases. Ratings that are very high or very low may require that you later justify them to the instructor or TA. ###
Rate each team member based on the following scale:
1 = Rarely or almost never. I don't think this person did this much at all.
2 = Occasionally. They did this sometimes but not as much as most others on the team.
3 = About the amount that was expected.
4 = Often. This person did this more than most other people on the team.
5 = Almost always. Much more than anyone else on the team.
 ###4 ###Promptness ###Did this person get done when they said they would? Could you count on them to meet the deadlines set by the team? ###Value of Advice ###Did the suggestions and advice this person give during the project turn out to be right more often than not? Did they know what they were talking about? ###4 ###Effort ###Results ###Based on the score you gave each person on your team, please give an overall rating to each team member based on what percentage of the work they were supposed to perform actually got done.

You have 100 points per team-mate to assign. You do not have to use all of your points if you feel team members did not deserve a score of 100 or greater. ###0 ###0 ###0 ###1 ###50000 ###Numvar ###Student ###-1 ###1 ###Equation ###-1 ###1 ###Numeric ###1 ###1 ###Percentage ###-1 ###0 ###Effective ###-1 ###0 ###Comment ###-1 ###0 ###Final ###2 ###1 ###ENDEDLOOP ###Overall Performance ###Your ratings should reflect each individuals level of participation and effort and sense of responsibility, not his or her academic ability. ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ### ###Please rate each of your team members on their personal attributes such contributed to the performance of your team. Their rating should be based on all the work done as a team, both in and out of class. You may use non-integer values (i.e. 3.5).

Your scores should have an average in the range of 3.0. Ratings of 1 and 5 should be reserved for very special cases. Ratings that are very high or very low may require that you later justify them to the instructor or TA.
###
Rate each team member based on the following scale:
5 = Excellent: Consistently went above and beyond,- tutored teammates, carried more than his/her fair share of the load.
4.5 = Very Good: Consistently did what he/she was suppored to do, very well prepared and co-operative.
4 = Satisfactory: Usually did what he/she was supposed to do, acceptabley perpared and cooperative.
3.5 = Ordinary: Often did was he/she was supposed to do, minimally prepared and cooperative.
3 = Marginal: Sometimes failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared.
2.5 = Deficient: Often failed to show up or complete assignments, rarely prepared.
2 = Unsatisfactory: Consistently failed to show up or complete assignments, unprepared.
1.5 = Superficial: Practically no participation.
1 = No Show: No participation at all. ###0 ###1 ### ### ### ### ###6 ###0 ###6 ###0 ###Please provide the percentage of work each person contributed to each of the tasks listed as column headings in the table below. All columns must add to 100%! If all team members contributed equally, put the same percentage in each column.

On a well functioning team each person may contribute to a task based on their interests and abilities; not everyone contributes equally to all tasks. The values you report below should reflect the actual amount of work you feel each person contributed to each of the tasks. ###Learning course material to be able to contribute meaningfully ###Helping research, define, and understand the project. ###Building or designing your portion of the project. Doing the work required. ###Helping to write reports. ###Other tasks such as getting parts, cleaning up the bench, meeting with the TA's, etc. ### ### ### ### ### ###5 ###This page shows the average of the scores you got on the peer ratings. It is not possible to determine which of your team members gave you particular scores. Please use this information to improve your performance on future engineering teams. Please remember that your score is determined both by your own performance as well as the maturity and insight of the people who gave you the scores.

For all the scores shown:
Values near 100 are expected performance.
Scores above 100 show a higher than average level of performance.
Scores below 100 indicate you need to improve your performance.
The mean score of your team and the class are shown so you can compare your score to that of your peers.

###The score above indicate how your team members perceived your overall contribution to the team. ###This score represents how your team members rated how your personal attributes such as attitude and maturity contributed to the team. ###This score represents the amount of work or effort your team members thought you contributed to this project. ###The score below shows your overall effectiveness which is the ratio between the results you produced and the effort it took to get those results. High scores on effectiveness means you were able to get good results with a minimum of effort. Low effectiveness scores mean you put in much more work than you should have to obtain the results you did. ###This graph shows the distribution of overall scores in the entire class. You can use this graph to see how you compared to the rest of the people in the class on how your team-mates perceived your overall effectiveness on the team. If the data is not clear you can drag the slider arrow below the graph to adjust the bin size. The table below shows the numeric scores represented by this graph. ### ###Your Course Name
Peer Evaluation System ###Please use your team number and the last five digits of your student ID number (not your SSN) to log in.

All parts of this peer evaluation must be completed. Your scores will be considered by the instructor to determine an overall team member rating score which may impact your team member's grades. Please be honest in providing scores to team members. ###Your Course Name ###http:// ###http:// ###If you have problems, please contact the instructor or TA's at you@email.university.edu ###