###ECEN4013 ###http://ecen4013.okstate.edu ###http://ecen4013.okstate.edu ###Please provide thoughtful written comments about each of your team members so they can learn how you viewed their contributions to the team. After all evaluations are submitted they will be able to read these comments but not tell who they came from. You and they can use this feedback to improve your future performance on engineering teams.

If you have a distinctive writing style we recommend you use one of the widely available text translators listed below.
The Dialectizer - convert to a humorous dialect
BabelFish - convert from English to another language and back (http://babelfish.altavista.com/)

###Enter a comment at least 50 words long for your teammate here. Do not copy and paste the same comment for all team members. ###1 ###Here you may enter comments that will be visible by the professor but not by other students. There is no way for the professor to associate the comments you make here with your name. ###50 ###0 ###Welcome to the Peer Evaluation system. Please verify that the names listed below are the names of your teammates. If anything is incorrect please contact your professor or TA before proceeding. ###1 ###1 ###Hours Worked ###Did this person always seem to be working in the lab? Did you always seen them when you came in? ###Taking on Tasks ###How willing was this person to take on extra work? Did your team always turn to them when something needed to get done? ###Helping Others ###Was he or she the fall-back person? Did they always seem to help others when needed? Did they help other people on the team complete their projects? ###Attention to Detail ###How much attention to detail did this person exhibit? Did they need to do every job perfectly? ###Completing Tasks ###How good was this person at getting their tasks done. Did they always finish what they started? ###Quality Work ###Was the work this person did right? Did their tasks work and get done right the first time? ###Please rate each of your team members on how much they contributed to your team. This rating should be based on all the work done as a team, both in and out of class. You may use non-integer values (i.e. 3.5).

Your scores should have an average in the range of 3.0. Ratings of 1 and 5 should be reserved for very special cases. Ratings that are very high or very low may require that you later justify them to the instructor or TA. ###
Rate each team member based on the following scale:
1 = Rarely or almost never. I don't think this person did this much at all.
2 = Occasionally. They did this sometimes but not as much as most others on the team.
3 = About the amount that was expected.
4 = Often. This person did this more than most other people on the team.
5 = Almost always. Much more than anyone else on the team.
 ###4 ###Promptness ###Did this person get done when they said they would? Could you count on them to meet the deadlines set by the team? ###Value of Advice ###Did the suggestions and advice this person give during the project turn out to be right more often than not? Did they know what they were talking about? ###4 ###Effort ###Results ###Here pretend you are working at a small company. The company president wants to set next years salaries based on the performance of his employees on this project. The president has asked you to suggest salaries for the other members of your team. You are asked not to assign a salary to yourself.

You know that the president will take the suggestions you make seriously, but they will also weigh the suggestions of others on your team and additional data before actually assigning a salary.

The amount below is the total amount of money the president said he can distribute. Below please look at the scores you rated your team members on in earlier parts of the evaluation then suggest a salary. ###1 ###0 ###0 ###2 ###50000 ###Pervar*.5+Numvar*.25+Effvar*.25 ###Student ###-1 ###1 ###Equation ###-1 ###1 ###Numeric ###1 ###1 ###Percentage ###2 ###1 ###Effective ###3 ###1 ###Comment ###4 ###1 ###Final ###5 ###1 ###ENDEDLOOP ###Honesty ###Was this person honest? Did they stand up for their beliefs? Did they take personal responsibility when they made a mistake. ###Self Awareness ###Was this person aware of the limits of their knowledge and competence. Could they accurately self evaluate their ability at any task? ###Maturity ###Was this person mature in dealing with others on the team or were they immature? Did they contribute to creating a professional environment? ###Attitude ###Did this person have a positive attitude that helped the team function? Were they pleasant to work with? ###Responsible ###Was this person responsible in getting their work done correctly and on time. Could you rely on this person? ### ### ###Please rate each of your team members on their personal attributes such contributed to the performance of your team. Their rating should be based on all the work done as a team, both in and out of class. You may use non-integer values (i.e. 3.5).

Your scores should have an average in the range of 3.0. Ratings of 1 and 5 should be reserved for very special cases. Ratings that are very high or very low may require that you later justify them to the instructor or TA.
###
Rate each team member based on the following scale:
1 = unacceptable performance, I would fire this person
2 = could use improvement, bottom 20% of people I have worked with
3 = meets expectations, middle 50% of people I have worked with
4 = exceeds expectations, top 20% of people I have worked with
5 = outstanding, a rare individual
 ###0 ###5 ### ### ### ### ###3.5 ###2.5 ###4 ###2 ###Please provide the percentage of work each person contributed to each of the tasks listed as column headings in the table below. All columns must add to 100%! If all team members contributed equally, put the same percentage in each column.

On a well functioning team each person may contribute to a task based on their interests and abilities; not everyone contributes equally to all tasks. The values you report below should reflect the actual amount of work you feel each person contributed to each of the tasks. ###Learning course material to be able to contribute meaningfully ###Helping research, define, and understand the project. ###Building or designing your portion of the project. Doing the work required. ###Helping to write reports. ###Other tasks such as getting parts, cleaning up the bench, meeting with the TA's, etc. ### ### ### ### ### ###5 ###This page shows the average of the scores you got on the peer ratings. It is not possible to determine which of your team members gave you particular scores. Please use this information to improve your performance on future engineering teams. Please remember that your score is determined both by your own performance as well as the maturity and insight of the people who gave you the scores.

For all the scores shown:
Values near 100 are expected performance.
Scores above 100 show a higher than average level of performance.
Scores below 100 indicate you need to improve your performance.
The mean score of your team and the class are shown so you can compare your score to that of your peers.

###The score above indicate how your team members perceived your overall contribution to the team. ###This score represents how your team members rated how your personal attributes such as attitude and maturity contributed to the team. ###This score represents the amount of work or effort your team members thought you contributed to this project. ###The score below shows your overall effectiveness which is the ratio between the results you produced and the effort it took to get those results. High scores on effectiveness means you were able to get good results with a minimum of effort. Low effectiveness scores mean you put in much more work than you should have to obtain the results you did. ###This graph shows the distribution of overall scores in the entire class. You can use this graph to see how you compared to the rest of the people in the class on how your team-mates perceived your overall effectiveness on the team. If the data is not clear you can drag the slider arrow below the graph to adjust the bin size. The table below shows the numeric scores represented by this graph. ### ###Your Course Name
Peer Evaluation System ###Please use your team number and the last five digits of your student ID number (not your SSN) to log in.

All parts of this peer evaluation must be completed. Your scores will be considered by the instructor to determine an overall team member rating score which may impact your team member's grades. Please be honest in providing scores to team members. ###Your Course Name ###http:// ###http:// ###If you have problems, please contact the instructor or TA's at you@email.university.edu ###